Hot-Button Compensation Rules Take Center Stage

Posted: Updated:

After varying periods of waiting in the wings, several big regulatory issues – from controversial topics just gaining traction to updated regulations moving rapidly toward adoption – stand to significantly impact U.S. employers. These rules affect employee compensation, pay equality, rights to privacy, and even the very boundaries of the employer/employee relationship. Here is a summary of three of these issues, including their statuses and trajectories (current as of this writing, but always subject to change), and what’s at stake for employers and employees alike:

Paycheck Fairness Act

The Issue:

The Paycheck Fairness Act, recently reintroduced in both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, is the latest attempt among many dating back to 1997 to update the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and “to end gender pay disparity by barring discriminatory practices and holding employers accountable for wage equity,” according to the Society for Human Resource Management, or SHRM.

The Status:

The bill introduced in the Democrat-controlled House recently passed, largely along party lines. A similar bill introduced by minority-party Democrats in the U.S. Senate has not progressed.

What’s Next:

The House bill is unlikely to pass in the Republican-controlled Senate. However, if the Act passes both houses of Congress and is signed into law, employers would face more stringent recordkeeping and reporting requirements. This would probably force many employers to conduct or sanction compensation studies, reviews or audits, and potentially change compensation policies to avoid regulatory penalties.

Ban on Salary History Questions

The Issue:

Included in the stalled Paycheck Fairness Act is a prohibition that would keep employers from asking job applicants about their salary histories or from using such information as a factor in establishing the hired employee’s compensation. Why do salary history questions matter? Because past compensation often influences present and future compensation. For example, because past gender-based pay inequities have kept women at an earnings disadvantage which the Equal Pay Act has not corrected, using salary history to determine current compensation perpetuates the gender pay gap. Because the Paycheck Fairness Act is unlikely to pass into law, this important issue will probably continue to stand on its own.

The Status:

The U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that would have prohibited employers from paying women less than men because of their compensation history. The lower court ruling was overturned by the nation’s highest court on a technicality – the 9th Circuit ruling was written by a judge who subsequently passed away before the final decision was issued. Meanwhile, several states have passed legislation banning salary history questions, including California, Delaware, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Oregon. Bans are also in effect in certain U.S. cities including Chicago and Cincinnati.

What’s Next:

Expect the wave of local and statewide salary history bans to continue to gain steam while the Paycheck Fairness Act remains stalled and the Equal Pay Act remains unchanged. In the meantime, employers should recognize the risks involved with asking applicants about salary history and consider eliminating this practice internally.

EEOC Pay Data Collection

The Issue:

Obama-administration Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) requirements for pay data collection via a revised EEO-1 Report have been in flux, with the current administration’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) having issued a stay. The revised regulation in question would require employers with 100 or more employees to report W-2 wages and hours worked for all employees within 12 pay bands by race, ethnicity and gender.

The Status:

The U.S. District Court for Washington D.C. reinstated the pay data collection reporting requirement, calling the stay an “‘illegal’ arbitrary and capricious decision that lacked a “reasoned explanation’,” according to a recent WorldAtWork article. The reporting deadline, originally set for March 31, 2018, has been set now for September 30, 2019. Per the EEOC, both 2017 and 2018 data must be reported.

What’s Next:

Employers with 100 or more employees must identify and report pay and hours worked within the required pay bands and segments by the new deadline. This may require an audit of compensation structures and reporting capabilities far enough in advance of the deadline to ensure compliance. Companies without the necessary internal resources to accomplish this should consider external consulting resources to avoid possible penalties for non-compliance.

Still to Come…

In addition to these volatile issues and updates, other key compensation issues loom large for employers, including proposed minimum wage hikes, changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the “Right to Disconnect” bill. Stay tuned!

Cassandra Faurote is President of Total Reward Solutions, a compensation consulting firm.

  • Perspectives

    • Take Time to Face Reality

      When is the last time that you as a business owner truly stopped for 30 minutes or an hour and truly took some quiet time to reflect on your business? Like most owners, it’s probably been quite some time. We all get busy doing things, working hard, taking care of customers, running the business. But if we don’t take some time each day, week, month or quarter to slow down, we are setting ourselves up for failure. Business leaders and owners need the time to slow down to...

    More

Subscribe

Name:
Company Name:
Email:
Confirm Email:
HTML
INside Edge
Morning Briefing
BigWigs & New Gigs
Life Sciences Indiana
Indiana Connections
INPower
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Events



  • Most Popular Stories

    • (Image provided by the Capital Improvement Board.)

      Indy Alters Plans for Downtown Hotels

      The city of Indianapolis has announced plans to change the framework for a major project in downtown Indy that has sparked controversy. The $120 million project, announced in October 2018, calls for an expansion of the Indiana Convention Center and two new hotels at Pan Am Plaza, which would add about 1,400 rooms. The project has drawn criticism from a group of hoteliers, who have expressed concern of a potential oversaturation in downtown Indy. Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett issued...

    • (Photo Courtesy: Roche Diagnostics)

      Roche VP on List of Influential Women Executives

      An executive with Roche Diagnostics has joined an exclusive list of prominent and influential women, including Oprah Winfrey and Serena Williams.  Cindy Carlisle, Vice President of Human Resources at Roche Indy, was named to Savoy Magazine’s 2019 Most Influential Women in Corporate America. 

    • Shelly Timmons

      IU Health Names New Leader of Neurosurgery

      The Indiana University School of Medicine and IU Health Physicians have named Shelly Timmons to lead the department of neurosurgery. She previously served at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center as vice chair for administration in the department of neurosurgery and director of neurotrauma.  

    • Bank of America Merrill Lynch Adds Mar

      Bank of America Merrill Lynch has named Lucia Mar as senior vice president and the newly created position of Indiana market executive for Global Commercial Banking. She most recently served as market manager for the Greater Tennessee market in business banking. Prior to becoming a market manager, Mar was a senior relationship manager with the healthcare and institutions team.

    • Elanco is headquartered in Greenfield.

      Elanco Finishes Deal on Pet Therapeutics Purchase

      Greenfield-based Elanco Animal Health Inc.(NYSE: ELAN) completed its purchase Thursday of Aratana Therapeutics (Nasdaq: PETX), a pet therapeutics company located near Kansas City. As Inside INdiana Business first reported Tuesday Aratana shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the $245 million deal.