Bid Protests: Protecting Your Rights in Federal Procurement Decisions

Posted: Updated:
Josh Schnell Josh Schnell

In 2017, the federal government spent approximately $500 billion buying goods and services from the private sector. On Feb. 9, 2018, after the shortest government shutdown yet, Congress enacted legislation that is expected to increase this spending by up to $300 billion over the next two years. Plus, President Trump recently unveiled his $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan to repair and rebuild the nation's crumbling highways, bridges, railroads, airports, seaports and water systems. 

Put simply, the federal government is getting ready to spend a lot of money, which means new opportunities for companies to win government contracts. As existing government contractors know, however, competing for federal contracts can be an expensive, time-consuming, and occasionally frustrating endeavor. If you plan to dedicate the resources necessary to compete for a government contract, you better be sure you understand your rights to challenge the government when it improperly awards that contract to a competitor.

Challenges to the government’s procurement actions are called bid protests, and they typically fall into one of two categories. First, there are pre-award bid protests. As you would expect, a pre-award protest challenges the government’s actions prior to having made the award.  For example, a pre-award protest might allege that the technical specifications in the government’s solicitation are written in a way that overly restricts competition or unfairly favors one of your competitors. Other common pre-award protest grounds involve ambiguous solicitation provisions, unreasonable evaluation criteria and small business set-aside issues. You should know you are likely waiving your pre-award protest rights if you fail to assert them before you submit your offer. Therefore, if you identify problems when preparing your offer, you should raise them with the contracting officer immediately, and if necessary, file a pre-award protest to protect your rights. 

Second, there are post-award bid protests. A post-award bid protest challenges the agency’s contract award decision. Post-award protests can involve almost any aspect of the decision-making process that led to the award decision. For example, the agency may have improperly evaluated the offerors’ technical proposals, past performance or cost and pricing information. In some cases, the agency may have relied on unstated evaluation criteria to award the contract. Post-award protests can also include claims that the agency unlawfully awarded the contract based on bias, bad faith or a conflict of interest. Although the timing can vary based on circumstances, post-award protests generally must be filed almost immediately after you learn of the grounds for your protest.

After identifying valid grounds for a pre- or post-award protest, you must determine whether you qualify as an “interested party.” This determination is critical, because only interested parties have legal standing to file protests. An interested party is an actual or prospective offeror “who possesses a direct economic interest in the procurement.”[1] In other words, only those with “skin in the game” can pursue bid protests. For pre-award protests, interested parties typically include anyone interested in submitting an offer. In the post-award context, however, interested parties are usually limited to those offerors who would have won the contract but for the agency’s alleged procurement violations.

Once you determine your interested party status, you must decide where to file your bid protest. Protests may be filed with the (1) contracting officer, (2) U.S. Government Accountability Office or (3) the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Each of these forums has its own rules, procedures and available remedies. Further, each has unique pros and cons you will want to consider when determining which one is right for the facts associated with a particular protest. 

Government spending is soaring, and the time is right for Indiana businesses to seek new opportunities to sell goods and services to the federal government. With these increased opportunities, however, comes the potential for sloppy, biased or otherwise unlawful agency procurement actions. Losing a contract doesn’t have to mean the game is over. If you feel like the government has taken shortcuts or committed improprieties related to your offer, you should consider filing a bid protest. It’s a step that may help you to win the contract, and it also helps to ensure the integrity, fairness and transparency of the federal procurement system as a whole. 

Joshua Schnell is a partner at Ice Miller LLP, where he leads the Firm’s Government Contracts and Grants Practice Group. Josh can be reached at (202) 572-1603 or joshua.schnell@icemiller.com.

This publication is intended for general information purposes only and does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice. The reader should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws or decisions discussed herein apply to the reader’s specific circumstances.

[1]  Sys. Application & Techs., Inc., 691F.3d 1374, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (citing Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United States, 575 F.3d 1352, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009); see also 31 U.S.C. § 3551(2).     

  • Perspectives

    • 'Clearity' for You and Your Team

      Rather than make New Year’s resolutions, I picked a theme for the year.  That theme was clarity. Having clarity means my actions and words align with my values and purpose.  This keeps me going in a desired productive direction. As I was clearing out old files and closets for the New Year, a new word popped into my brain: Clearity It’s actually not an official word, but it is my new theme. Here is why - clarity often requires a clearing.

    More

Subscribe

Name:
Company Name:
Email:
Confirm Email:
HTML
INside Edge
Morning Briefing
BigWigs & New Gigs
Life Sciences Indiana
Indiana Connections
INPower
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Events



  • Most Popular Stories

    • New Leader For Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute

      The Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute has selected Chris Watts as its next president. Watts, a public affairs veteran in Indianapolis, succeeds John Ketzenberger, who stepped down from the position in June.

    • 'Unique' Coworking Space Opens in Greenfield

      A new coworking space in Hancock County aims to fill an underserved need in east central Indiana. Idea Co-op features a traditional indoor coworking area, along with 36 acres of outdoor space that can be used by members. The coworking space is operated by Greenfield-based NineStar Connect and director of business and economic development Jill Snyder says the outdoor aspect makes it a unique concept for the region.

    • Vectren Merger Clears Key Hurdle

      The $6 billion merger between Texas-based CenterPoint Energy Inc. (NYSE: CNP) and Vectren Corp. (NYSE: VVC) in Evansville is one step closer to completion. The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has issued its final order on the deal, which CenterPoint says satisfies one of the two remaining conditions for closing the transaction. The merger agreement was first announced in April. CenterPoint says it now awaits the final order from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and...

    • Indy Lands Huge Air Conference

      Indianapolis has landed a conference that Secretary of Commerce Jim Schellinger calls a "big, big deal" in the state's effort to increase connectivity and attract more nonstop flights. The city will host the Routes Americas 2020 conference, which will bring about 800 representatives from airlines, airports and tourism organizations to Indianapolis. The city is only the third in the United States to host the conference. Routes Americas is an annual conference...

    • ClearObject Acquired By Equity Firms

      One of Indiana's biggest tech success stories is being acquired. Two equity firms have acquired a majority interest in Fishers-based Internet of Things company ClearObject. The company's headquarters will remain in Fishers and Chief Executive Officer John McDonald will continue to lead the management team. The companies are not releasing financial terms of the transaction. ClearObject was founded in 2010 as CloudOne, and designs, develops and manages Internet of Things-driven...