Leadership in the 21st Century - The LEAD Program: Foundational Principle Five: Similar vs Different

Posted: Updated:
Dr. Matthew Chodkowski and Dr. Terry Schindler Dr. Matthew Chodkowski and Dr. Terry Schindler

We are taught and conditioned to emphasize our differences, to accentuate our uniqueness, and to celebrate our diversity. But what about our similarities?

We are more similar than we are different. This is the fifth of the five foundational principles of the Leader Education and Development (LEAD) program conducted by the Institute for Postindustrial Leadership at the University of Indianapolis. We consider this the bedrock principle.

When relating to other people, we need to realize that our differences are primarily in degree, not dimension. Our similarities are evident on biological, psychological, physiological, emotional, and genetic levels.  However, we seem to put a premium on individual differences at the expense of mutual similarities.

There are many who do not accept the principle of similarity. They believe people are more different than they are similar – and even emphasize and perpetuate this myth by the way they think and act. Nothing positive or constructive comes from this belief because although our differences tell us apart, they can ultimately tear us apart. Only our similarities can bring us together. We cannot truly respect diversity until we accept similarity.

It may be true that most people intellectually understand this principle, but it is questionable they truly believe it. Empathy is related to the principle of similarity. When you believe in and internalize the principle of similarity, you begin to see yourself in other people. When you see yourself in others you respect the difference in others. Our differences are at the surface; our similarities are at our core. When you see yourself in others you realize other people do what you do; but you also realize that you could do what other people do – no matter how noble or ignoble.

Our similarities extend to our human needs and values. This is an essential element of the similar vs different principle. It is a common experience across cultures that the more we get to know different people the less differences we find between people. This is especially true when it comes to needs and values. We all possess the same core values because we all share the same basic needs. Values are positive and define our humanity – there are no negative values.

If you work for a manager or leader who believes people are not similar and focuses on differences, you become acutely aware of it by the way they speak and act, and in how they treat people. Their deep faulty assumption determines how they think and what they do. A similarities mindset breeds knowledge and trust; a differences mindset breeds ignorance and distrust. When similar vs different is internalized at the motive level it interacts with the other profound principles, determining how we think and driving how we act.

When we develop the similarity motive and form the related neurocircuitry, it does not mean we become blind to our differences; rather, it means our differences no longer blind us to our similarities. Only by acknowledging our similarities do we create the common ground that allows us to resolve conflicts, solve problems, cooperate and coordinate, and form coalitions and communities. This reality is constantly confirmed by our common experience. Yet sadly, it is all too often an uncommon occurrence between individuals, within organizations, and across cultures and countries.  

Three popular, powerful and appealing conventional beliefs perpetuate apparent differences that divide us. Race, gender differences, and generational differences all play instrumental roles in self-perpetuating stereotypes even though we know they are myths. Scientists have long known that racial categories recognized by society are not reflected at the genetic level and are now convinced that the standard labels used to distinguish people by race have little or no biological meaning. Race is a social concept, not a scientific one.

Most people believe that men and women are different, but it has been observed that across dozens of studies and meta-analyses, gender differences had either no or a very small effect on most psychological and physical variables measured. Other research has found gender differences fluctuate with age, changing at different times over the life span. This fluctuation indicates that gender differences are neither permanent nor stable. Myths about gender differences exacerbate and proliferate prejudicial beliefs and actions that affect both men and women at work and at home.

While quasi-scientific generational theories have created a cottage industry of consultants, legitimate research reveals that most of the publicized generational differences are nothing more than sweeping generalizations that are inconsistent at best and destructive at worst. Differences do exist, but they are much more the result of cultural, environmental, and age-stage differences. These studies do not support the conclusion that there are major differences in personality types, work-life balance desires, learning preferences or values from one generation to the next. All ages in the workforce have similar needs that they seek to satisfy. Broad social mores change over time, but certain human needs and values remain constant through the ages, including the need to be loved, respected, and appreciated. The most striking conclusion arrived at by most legitimate research studies is how much workers of different generations actually have in common.

We must rely on scientific evidence and profound principles to increase mutual understanding, decrease discrimination, and eliminate unequal treatment. The belief that people are more different than similar can only separate us from one another. Only when we become conscious of our similarities will we become capable of connecting with one another.

We are more similar than different. When we internalize this profound truth, we see ourselves in each other – our dignity and our humanity. We are bonded together by our human nature. We confirm and reaffirm this truth in the words “we are created equal with certain unalienable rights.”

Similar vs different is the basis for empathy, trust, and respect – the essential elements of collaboration in organizations – and the essence of postindustrial leadership.

This is the ninth article in a series by Terry and Matt. They are co-founders and directors of the Institute for Postindustrial Leadership at the University of Indianapolis. For more information about the Institute, go to: www.uindy.edu/postindustrial or email Terry and Matt at postindustrialinstitute@uindy.edu.

  • Perspectives

    • Take Time to Face Reality

      When is the last time that you as a business owner truly stopped for 30 minutes or an hour and truly took some quiet time to reflect on your business? Like most owners, it’s probably been quite some time. We all get busy doing things, working hard, taking care of customers, running the business. But if we don’t take some time each day, week, month or quarter to slow down, we are setting ourselves up for failure. Business leaders and owners need the time to slow down to...

    More

Subscribe

Name:
Company Name:
Email:
Confirm Email:
HTML
INside Edge
Morning Briefing
BigWigs & New Gigs
Life Sciences Indiana
Indiana Connections
INPower
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Events



  • Most Popular Stories

    • (Image provided by the Capital Improvement Board.)

      Indy Alters Plans for Downtown Hotels

      The city of Indianapolis has announced plans to change the framework for a major project in downtown Indy that has sparked controversy. The $120 million project, announced in October 2018, calls for an expansion of the Indiana Convention Center and two new hotels at Pan Am Plaza, which would add about 1,400 rooms. The project has drawn criticism from a group of hoteliers, who have expressed concern of a potential oversaturation in downtown Indy. Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett issued...

    • (photo courtesy Butler University)

      'Banner Year' for Butler Fundraising

      Butler University is celebrating what it calls a ‘banner year’ for its fundraising efforts. As Fiscal Year 2019 ended, the university had received $41.4 million from 15,823 donors. Butler says it was the second-highest fundraising total over the past decade. “This level of generosity demonstrates the incredible loyalty of our alumni, faculty, staff, and community, and the commitment we share to advancing Butler’s mission of providing the highest quality liberal...

    • Shelly Timmons

      IU Health Names New Leader of Neurosurgery

      The Indiana University School of Medicine and IU Health Physicians have named Shelly Timmons to lead the department of neurosurgery. She previously served at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center as vice chair for administration in the department of neurosurgery and director of neurotrauma.  

    • (Photo Courtesy: Roche Diagnostics)

      Roche VP on List of Influential Women Executives

      An executive with Roche Diagnostics has joined an exclusive list of prominent and influential women, including Oprah Winfrey and Serena Williams.  Cindy Carlisle, Vice President of Human Resources at Roche Indy, was named to Savoy Magazine’s 2019 Most Influential Women in Corporate America. 

    • Bank of America Merrill Lynch Adds Mar

      Bank of America Merrill Lynch has named Lucia Mar as senior vice president and the newly created position of Indiana market executive for Global Commercial Banking. She most recently served as market manager for the Greater Tennessee market in business banking. Prior to becoming a market manager, Mar was a senior relationship manager with the healthcare and institutions team.