A Weighty Question For Employers: Is it Illegal to Discriminate Against Employees Because of Obesity?

Posted: Updated:
Wayne "Skip" Adams Wayne "Skip" Adams

Since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), one of the issues which continues to perplex employers is whether obesity is a disability under the Act. The answer to this question is important for many reasons. As the percentage of our population that is obese continues to increase, so does the frequency of employment-related decisions involving obese individuals. In some cases, obesity may so severely impair an applicant's or employee’s stamina, mobility, or ability to use equipment that the individual is unable to perform the available work. In other situations, a worker’s obesity may present genuine safety concerns. If obesity is a disability under the ADA, the employer with these concerns would be obligated to engage in an interactive process with the individual to attempt to find one or more reasonable accommodations to enable the person to do the job. Refusing to hire an applicant or firing an employee because of obesity without attempting to reasonably accommodate him or her would violate the ADA. On the other hand, if obesity is not a disability under the ADA, or any applicable state or local law or ordinance, the employer would have no legal duty to give the obese applicant or employee reasonable accommodations and could lawfully refuse to hire or fire the individual because of the obesity. Only the state of Michigan and a handful or municipalities around the country, including Urbana, Illinois and Madison, Wisconsin, prohibit discrimination because of an applicant's/employee's weight.

So what have the courts said on the issue? In 1993, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Boston was the first to rule on this subject. In a case interpreting the definition of "disability" under the federal Rehabilitation Act, which parallels the ADA, the court upheld a jury verdict against an employer who refused to hire an obese applicant. The employer rejected her, because it feared her obesity would put her at greater risk of developing serious health conditions and limit her mobility, which would compromise her ability to perform the job. Although the court concluded the employer violated the law, because it "regarded" the applicant as disabled (a separate type of discrimination under the Act), it also volunteered that, even if the employer had not so regarded her, it violated the law simply because obesity, standing alone, is a disability, and the employer undisputedly rejected her because of it. Since then, each of the other three federal appeals courts confronting the question have held, to the contrary, that obesity is not a disability within the meaning of the ADA unless it is caused by an underlying physiological disorder that is a disability under the Act. One of the courts adopting that interpretation was the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Its ruling applies to employers and employees in Ohio, as well as Kentucky, Michigan and Tennessee. Until the decision in Richardson v. Chicago Transit Authority last November, no federal courts in Indiana, Illinois or Wisconsin, had addressed the issue. In that case, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois followed the lead of the Second, Sixth and Eighth Circuits and granted summary judgment against the plaintiff bus driver because his obesity was not caused by an underlying condition covered by the ADA. 

However, the bus driver has appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, and a number of medical and other organizations have joined in filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the appeals court to overturn the decision. Their argument rests in part on a resolution adopted by the American Medical Association House of Delegates in 2013 declaring that obesity is a “disease.” The groups supporting the bus driver’s appeal argue that obesity is not only a disease, but an impairment that affects many parts of the body and many life activities; thus, they contend it falls squarely within the ADA’s definition of disability. The outcome of this appeal, which may not be forthcoming for several months, will not be the final word on the subject. Ultimately, the Supreme Court may need to answer the question. 

In the meantime, how should employers protect themselves against liability for personnel decisions involving obese individuals? For starters, do not make decisions based on assumptions that an individual's weight will prevent her or him from performing satisfactorily or will lead to other health problems that may adversely affect attendance or increase health insurance claims. If an employee must be able to engage in certain physical activities in order to perform the essential functions of the job, the employer may require applicants to demonstrate their ability to participate in those activities. However, employers should not single out overweight applicants for pre-hire tests or simulations that are not required of all candidates for the job. If an overweight applicant or employee requests an accommodation, the employer should engage in an interactive process with the individual to attempt to identify one or more reasonable accommodations. However, an employer is not required to provide accommodations that are not reasonable or would impose an undue hardship on the employer or its business. If an overweight employee complains of harassment, the employer should investigate the complaint and take prompt corrective action if the investigation confirms the complaint, just as it should for a complaint of harassment based on race, gender, age, national origin or any other protected class. In summary, until the question of whether obesity is a disability is answered once and for all, employers can reduce the risk of discrimination liability by keeping focused on the job requirements and whether reasonable assistance can be provided, regardless of whether obesity is a disability.

For more information, contact Wayne "Skip" Adams or another member of our Labor, Employment and Immigration Group.

This publication is intended for general information purposes only and does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice. The reader should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws or decisions discussed herein apply to the reader’s specific circumstances.

  • Perspectives

    • Planning For Expansion or Relocation in 2019?

      Given the strength of today’s economy, business relocations and expansions that were once few and far between are now much more common. Businesses considering significant investments or relocations in 2019 will consider the cost and availability of workforce, logistics, cost of short- and long-term occupancy, and much more when looking for the ideal project site. There needs to be a good community fit as well. While these are all critically important factors to the success of a...


Company Name:
Confirm Email:
INside Edge
Morning Briefing
BigWigs & New Gigs
Life Sciences Indiana
Indiana Connections


  • Most Popular Stories

    • Indy Airport to Introduce New Airline

      Indianapolis International Airport will today host an event to welcome a new airline. Airport officials say the provider will add more routes to IND's growing roster of options. Earlier this month, the airport reported record-breaking traffic in the third quarter. IND said the more than 2.4 million passengers that passed through the airport in the third quarter of 2018 marked an 8 percent year-to-date increase over last year and the best third quarter in the facility's history.

    • IND Adds New Airline, Nonstop Routes

      A Florida-based airline, billing itself as an "ultra low-cost carrier," is coming to Indianapolis International Airport. Spirit Airlines Inc. (NYSE: SAVE) will begin daily, nonstop service to Las Vegas and Orlando in March, and add summer seasonal nonstop service to Myrtle Beach in May. Vice President For Capacity Planning Mark Kopczak says the airline sees "real potential for growth" in those routes, adding IND has done a good job "selling Indy as a place...

    • Stellar Communities Winners Unveiled

      Lieutenant Governor Suzanne Crouch has unveiled the two winners of the 2018 Stellar Community designation. The regions selected for the designation will receive state funding to implement the revitalization plans submitted for their communities. This is the first year the designation has been awarded on a regional basis. Each region will receive $4.5 million from the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs, $2 million from the Indiana Department of Transportation and...

    • National FFA Convention to Stay in Indy

      One of the state's largest conventions will remain in Indianapolis. The National FFA Organization has announced Indy will continue to host the National FFA Convention & Expo through 2031. The announcement comes two months after the organization set a new attendance record at the 2018 convention, which drew 69,944 people. The event had an estimated economic impact of $39.8 million for the city. The organization has previously committed to hold the event...

    • Indiana Companies Among 'Just 100'

      Three Indiana-based companies are including in Forbes' 2019 "Just 100" list. The ranking, according to the publication, features companies that are "taking the public interest into their own hands and generating better returns for themselves and society in the process."