An Investor's Perspective on the Real Value of Customer Success

Posted: Updated:

If you are in the tech space in the Midwest, you not only know of Bill Godfrey, but you may have been lucky to reap the benefits of his counsel. He is not merely a substantial investor in SaaS companies in Indiana, but he is also a valued advisor about how to make key early-stage decisions that will impact the success and future valuation of a company. He knows what he knows based, in large part, on his own experience as a software executive at Software Artistry, and then again as Founder and CEO of Aprimo. Software Artistry was acquired for $200 million and Aprimo was acquired for $525 million, giving Bill the personal expertise in building companies with strong valuations.

Regarding the strategy and financial model for Customer Success, Bill has some keen philosophies and insights about why and how to do it right. (Spoiler: Getting the model right can result in those subscription services being valued at the same multiple as the subscription software.)

The following is the first (of three) parts of an interview with Bill about his personal experiences as an executive building an expert services division. The second part of the interview focuses on Bill’s assessment of the current state of Customer Success. And, the third part offers his counsel for current SaaS companies trying to reap the true value of an expert services team.

Give us your thoughts on the formative years of Customer Success, and why it didn’t really work at first.

Every SaaS company knows the importance of recurring revenues and negative churn. To protect this nest egg, most software companies have created the role of account management, which is often disguised by calling it Customer Success.  Account managers have strong relationship skills, but typically lack deep product expertise and best practice insights.  Their incentives and quota goals make them sales people in their customers’ eyes.  This incarnation of account management is not what customers need, and it makes customers feel like they’re being nickel and dimed for every services request.  Account management as a function is also a serious drag on a software company’s profitability because it becomes a large cost center.  These economics make it very difficult to scale account management headcount.  This whole model is just broken and suboptimal.

How did you adapt at Aprimo?

At Aprimo, we initially did the Account Management model and experienced all these frustrations.  By listening closely to our customers, we innovated and created a Customer Success team that delivered expert services on demand for a subscription fee.  Our customers absolutely loved it because they always worked with the same expert resource who provided on demand, just-in-time consulting, and their costs were predictable.  We took all the friction out of the relationship.  We quickly realized that, for many of our customers, our Customer Success managers could perform the role of account management.  Securing renewals and upsells became a by-product of assuring their ongoing value attainment using our solution.  And our customers were more than happy to pay us an annual subscription fee for these expert services.  Within a few years, our Customer Success team was contributing $6-7 million in ARR at a 40-45% gross margin.  These economics enabled us to scale our staffing and capacity model to keep pace with our growing customer base.  Customer Success was a profit center and not a cost center.  And when we were acquired, we got the same valuation multiple on our subscription services ARR as we did on our software subscription ARR. 

In your experience both as a software executive and now as an investor, what do you regard as the essential priorities for an effective Customer Success model?

“Having lived in the B2B software application world for 25+ years, I have a philosophical belief that software left to its own devices will atrophy and die on the vine.”

The goal of all SaaS companies is the same: to grow as rapidly as possible. Having a negative churn rate is a big part of making this happen.  In my experience, this absolutely requires selling a “solution as a service” comprised of both software and expert services.  Customers typically end up wanting more expert services, not less, which can contribute to expanding your ARR per customer.

I think it’s perfectly fine for early stage and scale up companies to calibrate their pricing model for these subscription services to be at break even. I know there’s always concern about pricing being too high, which could create friction in the buying process. However, I think it’s more important to get everyone in line with your full solution offering from the start, and enthusiastically share that value proposition. Honestly, most experienced buyers expect this now, and you win credibility and trust points by proposing a solution with built-in, continuous best practices.

To get Customer Success started in that first year, you have to prime the pump with a handful of product experts (two or three), and you’re not going to have contracts to cover that expense. By year 2 it's profitable, and you’ll never look back.

Lisa Leahy is vice president of sales at Bolstra LLC.

  • Perspectives

    • Is Your Enterprise Ready For Digital Transformation?

      We are living in a historic era with accelerating market and technology disruptions that impact our lives and rapidly change how we do business. Cloud computing, advanced analytics, and digital technologies have the potential to transform how every company interacts with its customer. So, how do businesses keep up and (better yet) stay ahead? Enter the digital CIO. A new breed of CIO is emerging to lead companies through technology changes happening at record pace.

    More

Subscribe

Name:
Company Name:
Email:
Confirm Email:
HTML
INside Edge
Morning Briefing
BigWigs & New Gigs
Life Sciences Indiana
Indiana Connections
INPower
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Events



  • Most Popular Stories

    • Big Military Diesel Engine Contract Goes to Cummins

      Columbus-based Cummins Inc. has secured a more than quarter-billion dollar U.S. Department of Defense contract. The deal involves new and remanufactured engines for the U.S. Army. The DOD says locations of where the work will be performed will be determined with each order. The contract is for procurement of new commercial, remanufactured and remanufactured conversion V903 Cummins series 600 and 675 horsepower diesel engines. Cummins bills itself as...

    • IDOE Names 'Four Star Schools'

      The Indiana Department of Education has released its list of Four Star Schools for the 2016-2017 academic year. The designation, which has been awarded for the past 30 years, aims to recognize great schools throughout the state. 

    • 'Best Places' in Indiana Reaches Record

      The Indiana Chamber of Commerce has released the 2018 list of Best Places to Work in Indiana. A record 125 companies are being honored this year and more than 50 are first-timers or returning after a year or more off the list. Employers in over two dozen communities are represented and the chamber will unveil the rankings of the Best Places honorees during a May 3 awards dinner at the Indiana Convention Center in downtown Indianapolis.

    • F&W Moving Engine Line From Mexico to Noble County

      Kendallville-based Flint & Walling Inc. is planning to on-shore some operations to Indiana. The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne reports the manufacturer is shifting an engine production line from Mexico to Kendallville's former Superior Essex facility that it acquired a year ago. The publication says F&W is investing more than $5 million into renovations and equipment for small sump pump engines that will be used by its parent company, Louisville-based Zoeller Co.

    • Cummins to Design Combat Engines That Elude the Enemy

      The monstrous, larger-than-life military tanks of tomorrow could be powered by Hoosier ingenuity. A recent $47 million defense contract delivers marching orders for Columbus-based Cummins Inc.: develop the next-generation engine to power U.S. combat vehicles, and it must be stronger, but smaller, and elusive to enemies’ efforts to spot it.