Overtime Rule Changes Delayed, But Perhaps Not Dead

Posted: Updated:

Last month, a U.S. District Judge suspended the December 1 implementation date of changes to overtime rules in the Fair Labor Standards Act. While many businesses may be breathing a sigh of relief because they were in danger of non-compliance, the judge's order may be merely a temporary reprieve.

What led to this ruling? Texas U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant wrote that “due to the approaching effective date of the Final Rule, the Court’s ability to render a meaningful decision…is in jeopardy." The changes to the revised overtime provisions of the FLSA would have extended overtime pay eligibility to more than 4 million additional U.S. workers. But those changes had been challenged by more than 50 business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. And in September, Attorneys General from 21 states – including Indiana – filed a joint lawsuit against the DOL, challenging the constitutionality of the rule. Arguments against the rule included claims it would force many businesses to significantly increase their employment costs, disrupt state budgeting processes, and deplete state financial resources.

In citing the looming implementation deadline, Judge Mazzant acknowledged the pressure of the ticking clock. Despite a longer than normal lead time between the issuance of the Final Rule and its original implementation date, many business owners remain unprepared. For now, however, Judge Mazzant notes that his "preliminary injunction preserves the status quo while the Court determines the [Department of Labor's] authority to make the Final Rule as well as the Final Rule’s validity."

What's next? Congress may choose to move forward with a Congressional Review Act disapproving the rule, or the Trump Administration may also act on the rule once in office.

In the meantime, in preparing for the new overtime provisions, many employers found they had a large number of their employee positions misclassified, as they could not pass the "job duties test" regardless of their salary. So, regardless of the status of the rule changes, this is a good time for employers to remember that the DOL considers every employee non-exempt; and it is the employer’s responsibility to prove whether individual positions can be legitimately classified as exempt. This is done via several exemption tests that apply to executive, administrative, learned professional, creative professional, outside sales, computer-related occupations, and highly compensated employees.

The most challenging exemption test to prove is the administrative exemption. This exemption is for employees whose primary duty is performing office or nonmanual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers. All job duty test criteria must be met for this exemption which, typically, is used for key individual contributors. These criteria include the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance, regularly and consistently applied, with little time devoted to activities not directly and closely related to exempt work. The "exercise of discretion and independent judgment" entails comparing and evaluating possible causes of action, and then making a decision after considering them. "Matters of significance" refers to the level of importance and or consequence of the work. An employee who might meet this exemption typically formulates, interprets, or implements management policies and practices; can deviate from established policies and procedures without prior approval; carries out major assignments in the operations of the business; and can commit the employer in matters that have significant financial impact to the business.

If you found your company had previously used the administrative exemption for a position but you now realize the position cannot pass the job duties test regardless of the salary level, you might find it prudent to move forward with the changes as originally ruled. Additionally, if there are other employment practices you found in working through the proposed overtime rule that need changed to be in compliance, don’t delay your implementation of those needed changes.

What's more, some employment law experts recommend that employers make sure all employees who would have become eligible for overtime under the new rules begin tracking their time. Why? Because there is a chance the new overtime provisions ultimately will be upheld – and that the implementation date could be reset to December 1 after all. Stay tuned to see what happens next!

Cassandra Faurote is President of Total Reward Solutions, a compensation consulting firm.

  • Perspectives

    • Investing Lessons from Mount Elbert

      With little mountain-climbing experience under any of our belts, a few friends and I decided to take on Mount Elbert, Colorado’s tallest mountain. While regular climbers may not consider this “Gentle Giant” a tall task, it was for us inexperienced climbers.  Is investing your “tall task”? If so, you can learn a lot from our experiences. And you won’t have to climb a mountain to do it!

    More

Events



  • Most Popular Stories

    • Purdue University ranks #7 for Best Value in a college education in the U.S., according to the Wall Street Journal

      Two Indiana Schools Break Top 50 List of Best Colleges

      The Wall Street Journal and the Times Higher Education magazine have released their annual list of the top 801 colleges and universities in the country. Two Hoosier universities are included in the top 50.

    • School District Raises Questions About ILEARN

      Like all schools in Indiana, we were disheartened at the ILEARN results for school year 2018. We would like to raise several questions concerning this test as it relates to college and career readiness for our students. The annual Indiana Statewide Assessment (this year’s ILEARN) has been developed to evaluate college and career readiness at all levels tested. We are very troubled by our lack of understanding of what indicators in the test evaluate...

    • Sports betting is now legal in Indiana

      Protecting Data Integrity as Sports Betting Grows in Indiana

      Casinos across the state are opening sports betting parlors this week, legally allowing gamblers in Indiana to place bets on professional and some collegiate sports. Some opponents of the law are concerned the integrity of sports is at risk. Others are worried about the integrity of the data used by odds makers in the now-legal betting houses. “There's a mechanism in place that can stop that from happening, or curtail it from happening in the future,” explains...

    • Purdue to Open Chick-Fil-A Amid Protests

      Citing overwhelming demand for Chick-fil-A’s food and services, Purdue University has announced it will allow the restaurant to open on campus. The university has been at the center of a debate over the Georgia-based food chain. 

    • Buttigieg to Lead Task Force on Automation

      South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg will Friday launch a task force aimed at preparing for the effects of automation at the U.S. Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting. The mayor's office says “Automation and the Impacts on America’s Cities” will include mayors from throughout the country.